I think if you get scammed and you aren't a vulnerable type like very advanced age or disabled they really shouldn't cover it. It's like giving your money to a bad investment and expecting them to cover it.
Is this guy really suggesting that financial institutions should be responsible to pay if their customer gets scammed by someone through means outside the financial institution? What sense does that make?
I had a ticket open for years with my bank asking them when can i MFA my account. "My steam account has more security then my bank account" was a recorded line.
Hire 1000 Americans as mercenaries to "deal with" the problem to the tune of free travel and a $10k bounty per "problem" dealt with, expecting about 30 payouts per year each. You'd spend 400m annually. The population of scammers would drop by 30,000 annually, and the risks might force more out of the business. So for an annual cost 4% of the scam losses, we actually get results.
Once that annual scam loss is cut in half, we can divert those $5b of civilizational resources toward other things that improve Americans' lives. $5b every year.
3 different women, who have never met each other, have told me their dream was to rob a bank… I sure know how to pick them… Anyway; why rob a bank, when there are millions of people who would actually go and believe they can make money playing a game on their phones? Or buying crypto?
30 comments
just like the alcohol industry: "please drink responsibly"
Probably gonna get hate for this but I'm with the banks on this one
My bank make it impossible to be scammed unless your a complete idiot and dont read the warnings when adding a new recipent to send money to
I think if you get scammed and you aren't a vulnerable type like very advanced age or disabled they really shouldn't cover it. It's like giving your money to a bad investment and expecting them to cover it.
I love your channel
Using several legitimate (but also super sketchy) mobile numbers to communicate with your clients is perfectly fine
I love that the "beep" doesn't even cover the "fuck".
Brilliant.
Is this guy really suggesting that financial institutions should be responsible to pay if their customer gets scammed by someone through means outside the financial institution? What sense does that make?
all these rules bring it down to basically one thing…monarchs are back.
If they were smart they'd found a charity focused on scam awareness and then fund it just enough to write off their taxes.
I'd have fallen for the special Oasis tickets lol
For some reason this reminds of when insurance companies wouldn’t insure “Acts of God”
Call me crazy, but it’s not the banks’ job to give money to people who allow scammers to access their money.
Those Nigerian princes who all live in India always want to share their money with you. You only need to hand them your banknumber.😉😁
Baffles me people get scammed at all.
g2a in a nutshell
I had a ticket open for years with my bank asking them when can i MFA my account. "My steam account has more security then my bank account" was a recorded line.
glad that the ASIC is sueing the HSBC for not protecting customers from scams
Bro what the fuck are you? How are you so perfectly I don't even know how to describe it!!!
WOOOW YT censored me. Lovely.
Hire 1000 Americans as mercenaries to "deal with" the problem to the tune of free travel and a $10k bounty per "problem" dealt with, expecting about 30 payouts per year each. You'd spend 400m annually. The population of scammers would drop by 30,000 annually, and the risks might force more out of the business. So for an annual cost 4% of the scam losses, we actually get results.
Once that annual scam loss is cut in half, we can divert those $5b of civilizational resources toward other things that improve Americans' lives. $5b every year.
A day ago i got email from my bank with criatmas scam warning.(Scotiabank, Canada)
Exactly what theyre doing.
The entire chip card movement in the US was 100% about liability shift.
Danm I was scammed with Oasis tickets too! 😅😅😅
Just keeps getting more depressing
Why should they pay money to cover people making stupid mistakes
meh they get well over 3% of every transaction, and fair to say well over 97% are legit transactions, so they are still in the green.
3 different women, who have never met each other, have told me their dream was to rob a bank… I sure know how to pick them… Anyway; why rob a bank, when there are millions of people who would actually go and believe they can make money playing a game on their phones? Or buying crypto?
companies can get fined